Data Disaster: A Call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During Covid-19 (2:37:54)
Panel of researchers, doctors, lawyers, medical ethicists, educators and lawmakers moderated by Sayer Ji, Stand for Heath Freedom, 17 Feb 2021

• Sayer Ji (Moderator) — Author; Founder of GreenMedInfo; Co-founder, Stand for Health Freedom
• Dr. Peter Breggin — World-renowned psychiatrist and medical ethicist
• Mary Starrett — Vice-Chair, Board of Commissioners, Yamhill County, Oregon
• Dr. David Martin — Founder and Chairman of M-CAM Inc.; Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia’s Darden Graduate School of Business Administration
• Mark Thielman — Superintendent, Alsea School District (Oregon)
• Ana Garner, Esq. — Attorney; Creator, Higher Path Solutions
• Dennis Linthicum — Oregon State Senator
• Dr. James Lyons-Weiler — Biomedical researcher; Scientific journal author; IPAK
• Dr. Henry Ealy — Naturopath; Scientific journal author; Energetic Healing Institute

• First Panel: Historical Information and Context
• Second Panel: The Need for Accurate Data and Transparency
• Third Panel: The Mental and Emotional Collateral Damage
• Fourth Panel: There is No Public Health Emergency – Pursuing Legal Accountability
• Fifth Panel: Covid PCR Test / Concluding Statements

• video (2:28:17)
• mp3s:
  • Part 1, 0:00:00-0:40:10 (40:10)
  • Part 2, 0:39:54-1:20:11 (40:06)
  • Part 3, 1:20:01-2:00:12 (40:11)
  • Part 4, 2:00:00-2:37:54 (37:54)
  • Complete recording, 2:37:54
• Auto-generated transcripts: with timestamps, without timestamps

• Did the CDC Violate Federal Law?
  Ealy, H, M McEvoy, D Chong, J Nowicki, M Sava, S Gupta, D White, J Jordan, D Simon and P Anderson. COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective Science, Public Health Policy & the Law 12 Oct 2020 2:4-22
• CDC: Diving Into the Data Manipulation (35:57) interview - Dr. Scott Jensen, MN state senator and Dr. Henry Ealy delve into their work on the CDC’s role in coercing hospitals to manipulate data on death certificates.
• The Problems With PCR Testing - Why Public Officials Shouldn’t Base Restrictions On PCR Tests

• 00:00:00-00:03:05, Sayer Ji Welcome
• 00:03:06-00:27:44 (24:38)
  Introduction of Panelists

• 00:27:45-00:43:13 (15:28)
  First Panel: Historical Information and Context
  Sen Dennis Linthicum, Dr. David Martin, Ana Garner, Esq.
  Dr. Martin at 00:41:12:
  This is not a unique situation. Being informed is absolutely essential. The idea of participating in any democratic system anywhere on Earth requires education and that requires the capacity to make independent inquiry.
     One of the things that I find most alarming is the degree to which we are being asked to accept or believe information because it’s fed to us by a headline or by a public health official or by someone who’s standing behind a lectern. My goal has always been—and has been throughout the last now 20 plus years—my goal is to actually help people find the sources of information to make their own informed decision.
     So if I had one take away from this it’s make sure you source information to inform yourself, number one. But number two and equally important, be very aware of the fact that we’ve identified seven additional pathogens for which this exact template has been queued. So this is actually not a lone event. This is actually something for which a model is being built and tested and it is incumbent on us to understand that that needs to be disrupted before more harm is done.
• 00:43:14-01:04:48 (21:34)
  Second Panel: The Need for Accurate Data and Transparency
  Dr. Henry Ealy, Commissioner Mary Starrett, Dr. James Lyons-Weiler
  Included in this panel, Dr. Ealy summarizes key elements of the following paper:

  COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis An Evidence-Based Position Paper to Ensure Ethical Conduct 23 March 2021 Authors Henry L. Ealy, BSME, ND, BCHN Energetic Health Institute Michael E. McEvoy, FDN John Nowicki, ND Monica Sava Ph.D., CHN, FDN Neil M. Ruggles, BA COVIDResearchTeam@protonmail.com Reviewers This paper was reviewed for accuracy by a team of medical professionals, Ph.D. scientists, and attorneys. A Statement from Lead Author Dr. Henry Ealy Our COVID Research Team has dedicated more than 20,000 hours into investigating all aspects of COVID-19 and producing this work. The authors feel that it is a seminal manuscript that will empower elected officials, attorneys, professional organizations, and the public to take action on behalf of good people throughout the world. Our aim is to provide our readers with information pointing toward acts of willful misconduct, based largely upon what we believe is the withholding of evidence-based treatments, clear violations of federal law, unproven theories of asymptomatic transmission, fatal flaws in PCR testing, significant problems with projection models, and unethical practices that have created the possibility of poorly conceived experimental biologics being touted as the only solution to the global crisis we all face. We are grateful for this opportunity to serve humanity. Our hope is that this position paper sparks actionable ideas and meaningful conversations that bring people hope and a more detailed understanding of what is truly going on, which the mainstream media has failed to properly investigate in open and honest journalism. – Dr. Henry L. Ealy Executive Summary – Asymptomatic Transmission                  6 Executive Summary – PCR Testing 7 Executive Summary – Effective Treatments 8 Executive Summary – Violations of Federal Law 10 Executive Summary – Projection Models 12 Executive Summary – Violations of Medical Ethics 14 Executive Summary – Clinical Trials and Adverse Events 15

• 01:04:49-01:30:21 (25:32)
  Third Panel: The Mental and Emotional Collateral Damage
  Peter R. Breggin, MD, Superintendent Marc Theilman, Commissioner Mary Starrett
  Superintendent Theilman at 01:22:09:
  Things are really bad out there and I got an email today saying, You can go ahead and serve them but you better not try to get paid for them. And this is from the Director of [Oregon Dept of] Education and he is appointed by the governor.
     Something is very, very wrong. I asked Director [Colt] Gill, Why aren’t we getting accolades in Alsea? Why aren’t we being praised as a school that could, for all the good that we’ve done? On the huge waiting list we have? The massive number of board members who have come out to Alsea so they could see what it looks like to open a school during covid safely?
     I can go on and on but you know it goes back to what former speakers have talked about. It’s counterintuitive that we wouldn’t be held up as an example of what can be done. So I really want to encourage people: get connected and be active. My claim to fame, and probably the reason I was asked to be on this panel outside of running a school, was I started pushing back as Commissioner Starrett knows.
     I started getting active and I wrote a letter encouraging counties to open up because we had so many kids trying to harm themselves. The hospitalization rate—visits in the emergency room—for students attempting suicide and then those those kids, tying it back to not being in school, being isolated, being stuck at home.
     And I took it real personally. So I challenged the Oregon Health Authority Epidemiologist. Boy, did I not know what I was getting into. But I have a science background and I said, Look your data doesn’t make sense. As of October 20th we’ve got exponential number of cases being identified but hospitalization rates are going down. That’s impossible. You cannot have a three-fold increase in 10 days of covid identification cases and expect to see hospitalization rates going down.
     What I didn’t realize and what came out of it was the hospitalization data comes from a different source. So the epidemiologist challenged me about stochastic analysis. I said, Great. Where is it? I don’t see it on your website.
     Then then he just got quiet and he said, Why are you doing this? I said, Listen, I’m being told I have to close my school In January. We’re heading into the winter break. I’m trying to determine whether or not, under these metric rules, I can stay open and I need good data to do that and I don’t have it. So the summation of that is I told him I said, Look you you go back to OHA and report that Superintendent Thielmann needs to have his school open and he needs what we call “safe harbor” in Oregon which means we can stay open once we’re open. I said they’ve ended safe harbor. I’ve asked them to extend it and if they extend safe harbor I’ll get real quiet real quick.
     Well, two hours later safe harbor was extended through an email from Deputy Superintendent Colt Gill. Serendipitously, the next morning I’m driving to work and there was an Emergency OHA announcement on the radio news, AM radio, that they think we’re nearing the end of this most recent Covid spike as evidenced by a reduction in hospitalization rates. That’s when I realized something’s very, very wrong with that. That’s impossible. You can’t be a Superintendent, call in and do that and have it on the news the next day if the data is scientific, objectively rationally based. It’s not.
     I’m upset because more kids—kids are suffering, education is not getting done and we need to we need to really take a long look in the mirror and our political leaders and get back to what we’re supposed to be doing and that is serving kids and families, being here as a state and federal government, serving the people by which those governments exist to serve and not the other way around.
• 01:30:22-01:53:17 (22:55)
  Fourth Panel: There is No Public Health Emergency – Pursuing Legal Accountability
  Ana Garner, Esq., Dr. David Martin, Sen Dennis Linthicum
  Ana Garner describes her collaboration with Thomas Renz, Lead Attorney for lawsuits filed on behalf of Make Americans Free Again. Ms Garner is one of three attorneys filing two lawsuits:

  • In The United States District Court District Of New Mexico against Defendants:
    • GOVERNOR MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, in Her Official Capacity as well as Individually;
    • PUBLIC HEALTH DIRECTOR KATHYLEEN KUNKEL,
    • INTERIM DIRECTOR BILLY JIMENEZ,
    • and TRACIE COLLINS, M.D. Secretary-Designate of NMDOH,
    • Jane and John Does 1-20.
  • In The United States District Court Western Division for the Northern District of Ohio against Defendants
    • The United States Department of Health & Human Services,
    • Center for Disease Control (CDC),
    • Secretary Norris Cochran,
    • Director Rochelle Walensky,
    • The National Center for HealthStatistics (NCHS),
    • Director Brian C. Moyer,
    • and John and/or Jane Doe[s] 1-20

  At 01:32:23:
  I started working with Tom. I called Tom and I said, Look I think you’re on the right track. Nobody else has figured this out yet except you and that is he knew that he had to attack the entire base of this narrative which is there is no public health emergency. The way that we look at this is we’re looking at all of the data that came in.
     How did this start? They’re basing this public health emergency on the fact that there were modeling assumptions made by the Imperial College of London that were just absolutely so far off the mark that they were ridiculous. But what did they do? They instilled a whole lot of fear in a whole lot of people. ‘Millions of people are going to die,’ Fauci said. Remember?
     That started the whole cascade of false information that was being fed to all of the people who only get their information from mainstream news or perhaps the newspapers. If that’s the only place they get their information, they’re going to be horribly misinformed. That’s the beginning of it.

  For much, much more on pursing legal accountability see the ongoing compilation:
  Lawsuits Challenging Covid-19 False Claims

• 01:53:18-01:53:17
  Fifth Panel: Covid PCR Test / Concluding Statements
  Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, Dr. Henry Ealy, Superintendent Marc Theilman, Peter R. Breggin, MD
  Dr. Lyons-Weiler presentation at 01:55:44 on: IPAK Covid19 Death Ascertainment Protocol Evaluation
  at 02:02:58: [...and following] This is the reference I wanted to say about we need to basically replace the CDC: Plan B Public Health Infrastructure and Operations Oversight Reform for America. The CDC is not in any way—we heard it tonight—interested in any other cause of morbidity or mortality in the United States other than pathogenic illness that they might be able to prevent the diagnosis of with a vaccine. This is a massive, massive mistake on the part of the United States of America.
     I’m asking every American citizen contact their congressman and their senator and say, Take a look at this. Send them this paper. It’s freely available online. It’s peer-reviewed. Send it to your representatives and say, We really need to find out what the major causes of morbidity and mortality are in the United States and how do we reform the way we conduct ourselves in the United States of America that take all of those concerns into play?
     I’m not going to go into details but basically what we end up with is a neural network arrangement of entities scattered across the country that can’t do anything but learn. The most important point here is that at the end this is de-politicized. It is distributed all across the country in a way that that is decentralized and the President of the United States, and the Vice President of the United States who is President Pro Tempore of the House is informed on what the policies are. So it can never become public health—your public health, your wellness, your medical wellness—can never again become a political commodity. It is already a financial commodity.
  
  Dr. Peter Breggin at 02:26:50:
  I think we just need to be seriously looking at every level now because I think America is in as much danger as prior to the civil war, prior to the revolutionary war right now. We really need to take it seriously. I’ll give you a couple of examples of the stuff that I’ve been working on, writing about.
     A study is created in Brazil where people are given hydroxychloroquine in multiples of the toxic dose for older people and for sick people. It’s put up online and in one day it’s covered in the New York Times as ‘don’t take hydroxy, it kills people’. On one more day it’s put up online by the Journal the American Medical Association and on and on from there. Lancet has done the same thing. New England Journal of Medicine has done the same thing. WHO is doing the same thing. All of our major agencies. The CDC, it’s acting like it’s got medical jurisdiction telling us how we’re supposed to be treated. The FDA is way overstepped its legal bounds. The NIH tells us that we can’t treat people with covid-19.
     I’m a doctor. I could treat a person if I wanted to, though I’m a psychiatrist. When one of my family members got sick I had to put them in charge with the Front Line Doctors—again it’s important to know about the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons—and in one day she and her partner were well in the middle of a severe beginning of this case of covid-19 and she had many, many vulnerabilities. She wasn’t that young.
     A lot of it involves things that Doctor Ealy is talking about. The physicians, because—we have to give drugs. You know that. And I’m very sympathetic to your viewpoint because everything you’re talking about, pretty much what they’re combining with the medications they’re using. So who knows what it is? We got to study all this. We need everybody working on these issues from every branch of medicine.
     I want to just leave you—we’re really looking at something that is so much bigger than covid-19. We are looking at the death of freedom in science, the death of freedom in our chat rooms, and in our twitter and in our youtube, all these companies. And all these companies want to continue covid-19. They’ll take anybody down they feel like it who’s got a good idea about it. Literally. So this thing’s being kept up. It’s being upheld by a huge number of collaborating—roughly collaborating agents around the world including almost every billionaire that I could check out and all of the big companies.