Article: 680 of sgi.talk.ratical From: (dave "who can do? ratmandu!" ratcliffe) Subject: patenting of life forms - nature becoming evermore irrelevant Organization: Silicon Graphics, Inc. Date: Mon, 15 Jun 1992 15:56:27 GMT Lines: 89 this post contains info about a joint u.s. senate/house bill that cud shift patent rights away from the "first to invent" to the "first to file." more and more we travel into a reality where legalistic shell games re-enforce the capital accumulators lust for acquisition and control of the world around them and everyone/thing else in it including people's imaginations. --ratitor from m.a.p.: Article: 5021 of misc.activism.progressive From: hrcoord@igc.org (Human Rights Coordinator) Subject: Loss of Patent Rights Date: 2 Jun 92 19:45:13 GMT Lines: 67 ALERT! CONGRESS THREATENS PATENT RIGHTS Frieda Werden On April 30, there were joint US House & Senate hearings on a bill referred to as "FIRST TO FILE/FIRST TO INVENT." In the House, it is HR 4978. In the Senate, it's S 2605. I have not yet seen this bill, but according to an item on "BBC Science Magazine," its thrust is to change U.S. patent law so that the first to invent a patentable object or process will no longer have any intellectual property rights - all the rights will belong to the first to file the patent! The implications for small inventors, first of all, are horrendous. Instead of having the snowball's chance in hell that you get when you can sue a corporation for infringing your rights as the inventor, the person who invents a process but doesn't have the money for patent-lawyer knowhow will probably end up totally out in the cold. Supposedly, this is the way the law reads already in other countries and the U.S. is just trying to get in step with international law... Sure would save corporations a lot of hassle & lawyers' fees in defending against frivolous - or valid - suits. But there's another more diabolical side to this bill. Because the U.S. is aggressively pushing other countries to agree to the PATENTING OF LIFE FORMS (they have just become patentable in the U.S.) In fact, the Bush administration's chief objection to signing the Biodiversity Treaty being offered in Rio right now is (according to administration apologist Bob Grady speaking on "Nightline" June 1): "just the regulation of biotechnology and the subversion of intellectual property" contained in the treaty. Grady says that for instance the Merck company has just paid over a million dollars to Costa Rica for the rights to do "chemical prospecting" in their rainforests, and "if they can't have their intellectual property rights, they wouldn't do it." As explained by Indian environmentalist Vandana Shiva last November at the World Women's Congress for a Healthy Planet, the right to patent life forms would ignore the rights established by the pre-existing work of peasant farmers who have cultivated plants to their present forms. So this "first to file" bill is probably intended to close the door to all grassroots claims to compensation for their horticultural work. (A few years ago I read about a farmer in Mexico who supposedly had developed a strain of perennial corn, for instance - if a single seed got into the hands of a U.S. corporation, it could be patented and the farmer who developed it could even be prosecuted for cultivating it without paying a royalty!) As I say, I haven't read the bill yet. I have a copy on order. It should also be on file in all public libraries. I strongly advise everyone with any interest in inventing or in indigenous people's rights to ASK YOUR CONGRESS PERSON FOR A COPY OF THE BILL - THAT WILL LET THEM KNOW YOU'RE WATCHING THEM AND HAVE AN INTEREST IN PROTECTING INVENTORS' PATENT RIGHTS. Then read it, and stand up for your/everyone's rights. Posted by Frieda Werden, June 2, 1992 -- daveus rattus yer friendly neighborhood ratman KOYAANISQATSI ko.yaa.nis.qatsi (from the Hopi Language) n. 1. crazy life. 2. life in turmoil. 3. life out of balance. 4. life disintegrating. 5. a state of life that calls for another way of living.