My Reply to 11/28/02 Dallas Observer article


From: John Judge
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 02:38:23 -0500
Subject: My Reply to Dallas Observer piece


     In your coverage of the annual regional meeting of the Coalition
     on Political Assassinations held in Dallas your writer focuses on
     "conspiracy theories". The Committee for an Open Archives and the
     other member groups of COPA played a major role in getting
     legislation passed in 1992 that has led to the release of over 6
     million pages of classified government records relating to the
     assassination of President John F. Kennedy in 1963.

     COPA is a network of hundreds of medical and forensics experts,
     academicians and historians and independent researchers, some of
     whom have devoted a large part of their lives to the study of this
     assassination and those that followed in the 1960s.

     Those murders changed current history and the course of events in
     ways that shape the world we live in today. It is evident from the
     released files that JFK balked at CIA and Pentagon plans for
     covert and overt wars abroad, including US military support for
     the ill-conceived Bay of Pigs invasion, nuclear war as a response
     to the Cuban missile crisis, and continuation of the US presence
     in Vietnam.

     Kennedy did not wish a Pax Americana. Instead he called for an end
     to the Cold War and the nuclear arms race because "we are all
     mortal". He threatened to "scatter the CIA to the four winds",
     having already fired CIA Director Allen Dulles, who later sat on
     the flawed Warren Commission cover-up "investigation".

     JFK angered anti-Castro Cubans by working to normalize relations
     with Castro near the end of his life. He threatened the oil
     depletion tax allowance, which gave billions in tax relief to oil
     producers, including many in Texas. JFK was also responding to
     popular movements against war and for civil rights.

     Americans still refuse to believe that there was no conspiracy in
     the Kennedy assassination, and those alive in the 1960s also know
     the sense of hope that was killed in Dallas in 1963 and with the
     assassinations of Robert F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King,
     Jr. that followed in 1968.

     The newly released records also bear out the research and
     accusations of many early critics in the JFK case, especially
     those of DA Jim Garrison in New Orleans, whose story is depicted
     accurately in Oliver Stone's film "JFK". Stone was pilloried in
     the press for having the gall to include documented historical
     facts in his film, unlike most Hollywood historical propaganda
     which is entirely fiction.

     The files also show that the CIA maintained files on Lee Harvey
     Oswald from the late 1950s onward, and orchestrated a complicated
     "Oswald double" operation in Mexico City, just two weeks before
     the assassination, to falsely link the real Oswald to Castro.

     Dr. Cyril Wecht, the former president of both COPA and the
     American Academy of Forensic Sciences, will be hosting a debate
     next year, on the 40th anniversary between himself and the author
     of the single bullet thesis (a "coincidence theory"), Senator
     Arlen Spector.

     Your writer bemoans the lack of high-profile celebrities and
     assassination memorabilia at our meeting. We don't. We are the
     serious end of the research community, searching for the
     historical truth of these murders. The basic outlines are now
     known, and the files continue to be released.

     The fact that various historians focus on the roles of the Joint
     Chiefs of Staff, the CIA, the Mafia, or the anti-Castro Cubans in
     the assassination does not make them into confused and conflicting
     "theorists", unless all those who attempt to analyze history are
     "theorists". A combination of covert operations, disinformation,
     buried and destroyed records, and government obfuscation in the
     official investigations makes the case more complex, but not an
     endless mystery.

     Even the House Select Committee on Assassinations study [1],
     though flawed, was forced to conclude that the Warren Commission
     had been manipulated and lied to by the intelligence agencies and
     pressured by LBJ to reach a pre-determined conclusion regardless
     of the real evidence they collected, and that there was a
     conspiracy in the deaths of both JFK and Dr. Martin Luther King,
     Jr. No emerging evidence since has disabused any serious
     researcher of these notions.

     The recent civil suit brought by the King family in Memphis
     against a low-level co-conspirator led a legal jury to conclude
     that the conspiracy to kill the civil rights leader went to the
     highest level of the US government. There is clear unanimity about
     the conspiracy and the cover-up, and a general agreement about the
     role of US intelligence and military agencies in the crimes among
     those who study them thoroughly.

     Even the discussion about the alteration of the Zapruder film at
     our meeting was in the context of debunking the notion. As always,
     Last Hurrah Books provided the best as well as the most current
     books and other research guides in the field for participants. We
     were well received by crowds on the Grassy Knoll at our annual
     Moment of Silence on November 22nd.

     Your article was a cheap shot at serious researchers and authors
     who know much more about this case than the writer even tried to
     comprehend, but it was not as cheap a shot as the one that killed
     President Kennedy and the hope for social change that he
     represented. The rise in power after that murder of the
     "military-industrial-intelligence complex" that President
     Eisenhower warned of before Kennedy replaced him in the White
     House continued the permanent war economy, the expansion of covert
     assassinations and coups abroad and the US financing of foreign
     armies and wars (like the Taliban and Osama bin Laden as well as
     Saddam Hussein) to fight the continued Cold War, set the stage for
     the events of 9-11.

     Few know what has been done in our name over the last 40 years,
     but knowing it explains a great deal. Knowing that Kennedy, his
     brother and Dr. King might have turned us in a better direction
     had they lived should give us both pause and the courage to solve
     their murders and to demand that what is being done in our name
     today be transparent and meet the standards of justice and
     international law that give us any hope for future peace.

     I hope more Dallas community members join us next year for the
     40th anniversary conference or in Memphis and Los Angeles for the
     35th anniversary of the RFK and MLK murders, and contact us for
     information about the assassinations, the research, the best
     books, and upcoming events. Cynicism is cheap, but life and
     democracy are not. If they can kill the president with impunity,
     there is no real democracy. We want to solve the cases and reverse
     the sad history that followed November 22, 1963.

     John Judge
     Coordinator
     Coalition on Political Assassinations
     Washington, DC



     ----------------------

       1. See Chapter 15 The Final Cover-Up: How The CIA Controlled The
          House Select Committee on Assassinations of The Taking Of
          America, 1-2-3, by Richard E. Sprague, Third Edition, 1985.
          Mr. Sprague was an advisor to Representative Henry B.
          Gonzales (D-Texas) on House Resolution 203 which proposed the
          appointment of a committee to investigate the circumstances
          surrounding the deaths of JFK, RFK, Martin Luther King and
          the attempt upon the life of Presidential Candidate George
          Wallace. He served as a consultant to Richard A. Sprague and
          G. Robert Blakey, the first and second General Counsels of
          the House Select Committee on Assassinations and served
          through the end of the Committee's existence. [--ratitor]