C R I M E S    A G A I N S T    H U M A N I T Y

The 9-11 bombings Are Not Acts of War

The 9-11 bombings Are Crimes Against Humanity

the focus is:

Big Brother back to Crimes Against Humanity contents

"In George Orwell's classic novel 1984, Oceania is in a state of perpetual war with Eurasia. Even though the "Big Brother" state of Oceania insists that such has always been the case, the protagonist, Winston Smith, remembers that the states were in fact at one time aligned. The same is true of the United States and Osama bin Laden/Afghanistan. The CIA provided funding and arms to bin Laden during the decade-long proxy war with the Soviet Union. Now bin Laden, "The Evil One," has become the Goldstein character, who is held up as the "Enemy of the People." And our rulers readily admit that the War on Terrorism will last indefinitely.         "To keep the masses in line and to suppress opposition, Oceania developed a language called Newspeak, which actually reduced the number and variety of words in use to render dissenting thought obsolete. Closely related to Newspeak is doublethink, in which someone is conditioned to either say the opposite of what he thinks or think the opposite of what is true.         The U.S. government has engaged in such obfuscations with the passage of the Uniting and Strengthening America Act by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. Yes, it's the USA PATRIOT Act. Clearly the name of the bill was concocted to fit the acronym. The purpose of this acronym is two-fold. One, it makes it politically dangerous for politicians to vote against it ("He voted against the Patriot Act? Who can we nominate to run opposite this traitor in the next election?"). Two, it stifles opposition among the American people. "You're either with us, or you're with the terrorists." --Rick Gee, "The Arrival Of Orwellian America, Strike The Root, 1 Jan 2002

Bush Aides Consider Domestic Spy Agency, articles assembled by Paul Wolf, 17 Nov 2002 Bush Aides Consider Domestic Spy Agency, The Washington Post, 16 Nov 2002 Bush Aides Consider Bolstering Domestic Spying, Reuters, 16 Nov 2002 CIA Is Expanding Domestic Operations, The Washington Post, 23 Oct 2002 Iraqis in U.S. to be monitored for terror threat, The New York Times, 17 Nov 2002 Congress strikes deal on independent commission on 9/11, The Scotsman, 16 Nov 2002 Specialty provisions threaten to sink homeland security bill, Knight Ridder Newspapers, 17 Nov 2002 Who's watching the watchers?, by Derrick Z. Jackson, Boston Globe, 22 Nov 2002 John Poindexter to Head New Domestic Espionage Office: Is The Government Monitoring Our Every Communication Already? by The Partnership for Civil Justice Legal Defense and Education Fund, Fall 2002 No more Mr Scrupulous Guy, by John Sutherland, The Guardian, 18 Feb 2002 How one of the two brains behind the Iran-Contra scandal this week became one of America's most powerful men Who Knows? The FBI may be hot on the trail of books read by potential terrorists. We're not sure because we're not permitted to know, by Nat Hentoff, Legal Times, 22 Apr 2002 Background and Shockwaves of 9-11: An Orwellian Nightmare by Biörn Ivemark, Indymedia, 5 Feb 2002 Is the US Turning Into a Surveillance Society?: ACLU, 15 Jan 2003 Bigger Monster, Weaker Chains: The Growth of an American Surveillance Society, by Jay Stanley and Barry Steinhardt, ACLU, 15 Jan 2003 Is the Threat From "Total Information Awareness" Overblown?, by Jay Stanley, 18 Dec 2002 Q&A on the Pentagon's "Total Information Awareness" Program, ACLU Keeping CCTV In Bounds--What's Wrong With Public Video Surveillance?, ACLU The USA PATRIOT Act Was Planned Before 9/11, Jennifer Van Bergen, t r u t h o u t, 20 May 2002 Note (beginning about two-thirds of the way down) how Section 218 of the USAPA opens the door to "the FBI, the CIA, or any other intelligence agency, ... surveil[ling] you without probable cause, as long as they say the surveillance has something to do with a foreign intelligence investigation of some sort (which may otherwise not even involve you directly). . . . [I]t is obvious that the proponents of this amendment [to the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)] know it is an end-run around the Fourth Amendment. They have had many years to think about it and have repeatedly shown their willingness to enact carefully crafted, unconstitutional laws." Homeland Security Act: The Rise of the American Police State, by Jennifer Van Bergen, truthout, 2,3,4 Dec 2002 Text of Homeland Security Act, (H.R. 5005), November 2002 Terrorism in the Age of Surveillance by Paul Wolf with accompanying articles, 28 Jul 2002 This excerpt from Frank Donner's book, The Age of Surveillance (1980), written while the United States was still in the grip of anti-communist paranoia, gives an interesting historical perspective. Ashcroft: TIPS Plan Won't Have Central Database - Anti-Terror Information Will Be Passed On, He Tells Committee, by Dan Eggen, Washington Post, 26 Jul 2002 Ashcroft's Terrorism Policies Dismay Some Conservatives, by Neil A. Lewis, New York Times, 23 Jul 2002 FISA Court Decision by Paul Wolf with accompanying articles, 2 Sep 2002 Introduction "The discretion to choose which groups to put under surveillance, and especially the discretion to say who are the members of those groups, are really the issues here. According to the FISA statute, `foreign power' includes what we call terrorist organizations, and `agent of a foreign power' includes anyone working with them." Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Opens Up, by Steven Aftergood, Secrecy News, from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy, 27 Aug 2002 Secret Court Decision Silently Overrules Provision of PATRIOT Act, by Jennifer Van Bergen, truthout, 25 Aug 2002 Balanced vs. Unbalanced Law Enforcement, Excerpts from the Church Committee Reports of 1975-76 A Shot Across the Bow From the Darkness, by Jonathan Turley, Los Angeles Times, 26 Aug 2002 Court Backs Open Deportation Hearings in Terror Cases, by Adam Liptak, New York Times, 27 Aug 2002 Ashcroft Watch by Nat Hentoff: The Terror of Pre-Crime, The Progressive, Sep 2002 The Globalization of Repression: A Special Report to the European Parliament, December 2001 This edited version of a 112-page report was prepared by the Omega Foundation for the European Parliament's department of Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (STOA) and published in September 1998. While the report and its subsequent updates are widely known throughout Europe, it has never appeared in the US media. The 1998 Executive Summary, from STOA, Luxembourg, is titled: "STOA: An Appraisal Of The Technologies Of Political Control." Barak in to bat for Big Brother, by Ian Grayson, The Australian, 1 Mar 2002 Chief Takes Over New Agency to Thwart Attacks on U.S., by John Markoff, New York Times, 13 Feb 2002 "Mr. Poindexter was responsible for several computer policy mistakes in the computer security realm in the 1980's," said Marc Rotenberg, a former counsel with Senate Judiciary Committee, referring to Mr. Poindexter's policies that shifted control of computer security to the military. "It took three administrations and both political parties over a decade to correct those mistakes." The Arrival Of Orwellian America, by Rick Gee, Strike The Root, 1 Jan 2002 Disputed Air ID Law May Not Exist, by Paul Boutin, Wired, 15 Aug 2002 Secrecy of September 11 Detainees Challenged Center for National Security Studies v. The Department Of Justice Secrecy News, by Steven Aftergood, from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy, 25 March 2002

"In 1990 Poindexter was convicted for the felonies of conspiracy and lying to Congress and obstructing congressional inquiries. [Although] [t]he conviction was overturned in 1991 . . . [t]he facts of Poindexter's lying and gutting of the Constitution were never in dispute, not when he defiantly told the world, `The buck stops here with me.'         "Now the Bush administration, as if to punctuate its assault on civil liberties under the cover of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, has appointed Poindexter to figure out how to assemble and use all the data one could possibly gather on Americans. . . . By appointing Poindexter, the administration justifies fears that it will treat our privacy in the cavalier way that Poindexter once treated the law. . . .         "The fact that Poindexter has already admitted keeping knowledge of illegal activities from the president should automatically disqualify him from having anything to do with the privacy of Americans. The fact that the White House cannot talk straight about his appointment should make Americans demand that the project be scrapped until secrecy becomes an open debate." " --Derrick Jackson, "Who's watching the watchers?," Bostoh Globe, 22 Nov 2002

Crimes Against Humanity contents:

Subject Index

Quotations

Further Reading On the Web

back to CAH | ratville | rat haus | Index | Search | tree